The Bank

Delivery heartbeat: WIP caps, lead/cycle time, throughput, defect escape.
← Back to Hub

Before we dive in: if you’d like to follow along, click Start Demo. I’ll keep this to 60–120 seconds and then pause.

Backup anchors: README #demo-start

Demo Start

Agenda (≈5 min): 3-min delivery snapshot → 2-min The Bank demo → Q&A.

Note: dashboard uses synthetic data; patterns mirror real workflows.

Next → Elevator Pitch

Elevator Pitch

BLUF: I stabilize delivery via WIP caps, lead/cycle time, throughput, and defect escape.

  • When WIP > cap for 3+ days, lead time spikes → stop-starting, start-finishing.
  • If Review is the longest wait → fix policy: clear entry/exit, fewer handoffs, smaller batches.
  • QA harness (schema/null/dupe) before promote → rework drops without killing throughput.

Back ↑

Delivery Toolkit Snapshot

  • WIP caps to keep flow stable (stop-starting, start-finishing).
  • Lead/cycle time visible and time-boxed.
  • Throughput tracked at steady cadence.
  • Defect escape reduced via a lightweight QA harness.

Back ↑

The Bank — 3-Scene Demo

  1. Heartbeat: WIP vs cap → if breached 3+ days, re-prioritize.
  2. Bottleneck: Stage-duration view → longest wait gets a policy fix.
  3. Quality: Defect escape / rework% → pre-promote QA harness.

Next → Q&A & Wrap Back ↑

Q&A and Wrap

  • 90-day success metrics?
  • Where does work stall today (intake, review, UAT)?
  • Toolchain & request flow (SQL/PBI/Git)?
  • Relief valve when WIP > cap?
  • Member-impact tie-back?

Pilot ask: “I can baseline your flow (WIP/lead-time + QA gate) in one sprint.”

Back to Start ↑

© FourTwenty Analytics